Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas

Questions regarding Philosophical Anthropology - 1st semester

Code

722031032

Academic unit

Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas

Department

Filosofia

Credits

10

Teacher in charge

Mário Jorge Carvalho, Nuno Carlos Venturinha

Weekly hours

3 letivas + 1 tutorial

Teaching language

Portuguese

Objectives

a) Acquire a high level of knowledge in the field of Philosophical Anthropology and in particular a detailed knowledge of the fundamental concepts and of the history of Philosophical Anthropology, of its methodological and doctrinal controversies and of its articulation with other branches of philosophy and science.
b) Acquire detailed knowledge of the fundamental texts in the field of Philosophical Anthropology, with a mastering of time-honoured interpretations and of the current state of research.
c) Acquire a high ability to analyse, compare, criticise and use anthropological concepts, and also to independently discuss problems and doctrinal views in the field of Philosophical Anthropology.
d) Acquire the ability to carry out research work under supervision in this field that meets high scientific quality standards.
e) Acquire the ability to carry out independent research in this area.

Prerequisites

Not applicable

Subject matter

Class A
Fichte’s Bestimmung des Menschen
What is Fichte’s Bestimmung des Menschen all about?
What is a Bestimmungsfrage? Does this question still make sense? What is the connection between Bestimmungsfrage(n) and the Bestimmung des Menschen? And in particular:
1) What is the anthropological relevance of the Bestimmungsfrage and of a Bestimmung des Menschen?
2) What are the distinctive features of Fichte’s attempt to answer the Bestimmungsfrage? And does Fichte’s Bestimmung des Menschen have any relevance to us?
Our purpose is to study both Fichte’s Bestimmung des Menschen (its antecedents, its content, meaning and implications) and the philosophical questions that arise from it.

Class B
Facts and Values
In his first work, the Tractatus, Wittgenstein makes a sharp distinction between the facts of the world, understood as what is the case, and the valuation that man attributes to them, be it of an aesthetical, ethical or religious nature. Objects and states of affairs are then seen within the framework of a fundamental anthropological relation, which culminates in a peculiar solipsistic-transcendental view of a linguistic character. The seminar aims to follow first the philosophical anthropology of the Tractarian period, examining next its maturation in Wittgenstein’s so-called “later” philosophy, where the distinction between fact and value gives room to a study of the multiplicity of the language games that characterize man. We shall concentrate on the aesthetical, ethical and religious games, which will allow us to access Wittgenstein’s idea of a “natural history of human beings” or of “human concepts”.

Bibliography

Turma/Class A
Die Bestimmung des Menschen, auf der Grundlage der Ausg. von Fritz Medicus rev. von Horst D. Brandt. Mit einer Einleitung von Hansjürgen Verweyen, Hamburg, Meiner, 2000
J. G. FICHTE, The Vocation of Man, Translated, with Introduction and Notes by Peter Preuss, Indianapolis, Hackett Pub. Co., 1987
The Vocation of Man, Ed., with an Introduction by Roderick M. Chisholm, Indianapolis/New York, Bobbs-Merrill, 1956
La destination de l´homme, trad. inédite, introduction, notes et bibliogr. par Jean-Christophe Goddard, Paris, Flammarion, 1995
La destinazione dell´uomo, traduzione di Remo Cantoni, a cura di Claudio Cesa, Roma, Laterza, 2001

Turma/Class B
Venturinha, Nuno. (2010). Lógica, Ética, Gramática: Wittgenstein e o Método da Filosofia. Lisboa: INCM.
Wittgenstein, L. (1933). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge; (1987). Tratado Lógico-Filosófico. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). Bemerkungen über Frazers Golden Bough / Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. In Philosophical Occasions 1912-1951 (pp. 115-155). Indianapolis: Hackett; (2011). Observações sobre “O Ramo Dourado” de Frazer. Porto: Deriva.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell; (1987). Investigações Filosóficas. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.


Teaching method

This curricular unit has a theoretical-practical character.
Seminar-oriented classes.
Reading and interpretation of and commentary on Plato’s Symposium. Analysis and discussion both of interpretive (including syntactic and semantic) issues and related philosophical questions and concepts.
The teaching methodology combines: a) a thorough interpretation of Plato’s Symposium (of its different components, of their connection both with each other and with the rest of the corpus platonicum) b) a theoretical analysis of philosophical problems, and c) a discussion of alternative views, objections, counter-examples, etc.

In class teaching

Evaluation method

Class A
Individual appraisal. Each student will have to present a research paper (of about 20 pages) on a topic individually agreed upon with the Lecturer and then discuss this paper with the latter. This counts for 3/4 of final marks. Class participation (participation in the discussion) counts for 1/4 of final marks.

Class B
The method adopted for the class combines readings and commentaries of texts in seminar along with discussion of student papers.

Courses