Laboratory Rotation II
    
     Code
     1071002
    
    
     
     
    
    
     
     
    
    
     Credits
     10
    
    
     Teacher in charge
     Henrique Manuel Paixão dos Santos Girão
    
    
     
     
    
    
     
     
    
    
     
     
    
    
     Teaching language
     Portuguese/English
    
    
     Objectives
     
This curricular unit aims to prepare the students for the laboratory work of their PhD thesis in research areas in aging and chronic diseases. Moreover, it aims to give students training in techniques and methods with which they are not familiar yet. It is expected that the students acquire laboratory skills, such as planning an experiment, performing it and analyzing the results. It is also expected that the students learn how to interpret the results and find the reasons behind failures and problems, as well as strategies to overcome these. At the end, the students should have acquired knowledge about specific techniques and most of all the general knowledge of what it means starting from a scientific question, finding strategies to answer it and interpret the meaning of the experimental data. Another important goal is to endow the students with oral and written communication skills and the discussion of the work with an audience.
    
    
     Prerequisites
     
 
    
    
     Subject matter
     
. Proteostasis, ageing and disease
. The role of ivabradine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion
. Transcriptional deregulation and mitochondrial dysfunction in Huntington's disease
. Autophagic dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease: Rab7 protection
. ER-stress and protein quality control
. Translational bigenomics and Pharmacogenomics - clinical potential
. Diabetes and brain ageing.
    
    
     Bibliography
     
Scientifc papers.
    
    
     Teaching method
     
The teaching of this UC is essentially practical. All the techniques will be first demonstrated and the student will afterwards apply them under proper supervision. Daily, the supervisor will discuss the experimental plan and the student's questions answered. The student is expected to understand why the experimental strategy is the most adequate to answer the initial question. The detailed protocol will also be reviewed with the student. When the experiment ends, or at least weekly, the student and the supervisor will discuss the results obtained and possible interpretations, deciding together what is the most logical next step.
    
    
     Evaluation method
     
The evaluation will be based on a written report that should be handed in a pre-established date, the oral presentation of this report and the evaluation of the supervisor. Each one of these will weight 1/3 of the final score.
    
  
  
  Courses